Get UTR!!

Post by **special_Kare** » Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:42 pm

The day has finally come.

I have been waiting for this mod for a while now, here's a brief description

UTR ALPHA RELEASED
The UTR mod development team proudly presents the Alpha preview release of the first full-conversion of Unreal Tournament Game of The Year Edition to Unreal Engine 2.5 (aka UT2004): Unreal Tournament Revolution. UTR Alpha Release has the core features and gameplay in, and aims to be a solid base upon which we can tweak and upgrade with the help of the UT community to become the true continuation of the legend that began it all. Combining the vastly improved netplay and visual features of UT2004 with the classic feel and atmosphere, UTR Alpha Release includes the return of such weapons as the Dual Enforcers, Impact Hammer, and Ripper. Our upgraded Flak Cannon should also give you a small taste of what is being planned for the Beta stages...

http://www.getutr.com

So dont delay!! If u own a copy of UT2004 and never installed it, nows your chance to make use of it!@!@

For best results it's recommended to do these steps exactly in this order!!!

First, install 'Patch3369' from here>>http://www.worthdownloading.com/downloa ... 47&id=6108

Second, install 'ECE Bonus Pack' from here>>http://downloads.unrealadmin.org/UT2004 ... ack1-1.exe

Third, install UTR from here, and be sure to read the directions within the .txt file very carefully!>>>>http://levi.teamspeak.org/dl/redirect.php?fileid=1572

enjoy.... !!

LD8242 · Post by **LD8242** » Tue Dec 20, 2005 8:43 am

the vastly improved netplay and visual features of UT2004

They must be joking

Post by **special_Kare** » Tue Dec 20, 2005 9:33 am

actually the netplay and visual features of 2004 are the best part, its the gameplay that stinks

Â«ÃŒrÃ°qÂµÃ°Ã¯Â§_Ã¾lÃ¯Â§kÃ¯Ã±Â»

it always has stunk of shit tho .....

LD8242 · Post by **LD8242** » Tue Dec 20, 2005 11:51 am

special_Kare wrote:actually the netplay and visual features of 2004 are the best part, its the gameplay that stinks

UT2003 has better "visual features" imo, 2004 is an insult to a decent series of games

Post by **special_Kare** » Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:46 pm

and thats y they created UTR!! what are u waiting for?! stop complaining and give it a try, for crying out loud LD u whine more than a 4 year old girl!! stop complaining and try it

Post by **special_Kare** » Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:47 pm

LD8242 wrote:
special_Kare wrote:actually the netplay and visual features of 2004 are the best part, its the gameplay that stinks
UT2003 has better "visual features" imo, 2004 is an insult to a decent series of games

i dont see how thats possible, 2003 was like a cartoon

LD8242 · Post by **LD8242** » Tue Dec 20, 2005 2:29 pm

special_Kare wrote:
LD8242 wrote:
special_Kare wrote:actually the netplay and visual features of 2004 are the best part, its the gameplay that stinks
UT2003 has better "visual features" imo, 2004 is an insult to a decent series of games
i dont see how thats possible, 2003 was like a cartoon

Nope, and UT2004 is just too small, the chars look small, the vehicles look small, everthing it too damn small, the maps are boring and empty, it's just a below average FPS, that's why I uninstalled it may aswell bin the dvd

LD8242 · Post by **LD8242** » Tue Dec 20, 2005 2:33 pm

btw is The Chronicles of Riddick any good?

Post by **Captain_Obvious** » Tue Dec 20, 2005 10:47 pm

LD8242 wrote:Nope, and UT2004 is just too small, the chars look small, the vehicles look small, everthing it too damn small, the maps are boring and empty, it's just a below average FPS, that's why I uninstalled it may aswell bin the dvd

Yeah, what could be more below average than this?
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/ut2004/review.html

Compare to these:
http://www.gamespot.com/reviews.html?ty ... all&page=0

BTW, I dont know if you explored the game at all, but you can play 2k4 as an almost identical game to 2003. (same maps and everything) But with the additions of onslaught, assault, etc...

Post by **Captain_Obvious** » Tue Dec 20, 2005 10:55 pm

I remember when I was buying 2k4, I was tempted to buy 2k3 along with it because they offered a $10 rebate to anyone that already owned 2003. I decided against it when I found out that 2k4 already included the entire 2k3 game. The $10 rebate was pretty much just their way of saying. "Sorry, we fucked up with 2003, but here's $10 back to cover the content that you already paid for with 2003."

LD8242 · Post by **LD8242** » Wed Dec 21, 2005 12:41 pm

Gamespot always overrates mainstream games, just like any other big site or magazine.
UT2004 doesn't do the UT series justice IMO and in the opinion of plenty of people, it just doesnt feel right, the weps are boring and the gameplay is just

Post by **Captain_Obvious** » Wed Dec 21, 2005 1:18 pm

UT2004 doesn't do the original UT justice, but it kicks the pants off of 2003 (for the reasons that I already stated) So remind me... what was the topic of this thread?

That's right, it was about converting UT2004 to be like the original!!!

\/.oDK@ · Post by **\/.oDK@** » Wed Dec 21, 2005 4:33 pm

??r?q????_?l??k??? wrote:it always has stunk of shit tho .....

Rickshaw · Post by **Rickshaw** » Wed Dec 21, 2005 6:35 pm

Captain_Obvious wrote:UT2004 doesn't do the original UT justice, but it kicks the pants off of 2003 (for the reasons that I already stated) So remind me... what was the topic of this thread?

That's right, it was about converting UT2004 to be like the original!!!

Settled arguments, such as this one, prove that court cases can be practiced entirely on the internet. It's only a matter of time

.

LD8242 · Post by **LD8242** » Wed Dec 21, 2005 7:04 pm

Captain_Obvious wrote:UT2004 doesn't do the original UT justice, but it kicks the pants off of 2003 (for the reasons that I already stated) So remind me... what was the topic of this thread?

That's right, it was about converting UT2004 to be like the original!!!

I was just expressing my opinion on UT2004 being shit, if you like it good for you, imo 2003 is better, anyway might try this mod if i can be arsed installing UT2004 again, takes about 17 hours

.

Rickshaw · Post by **Rickshaw** » Thu Dec 22, 2005 2:49 pm

LD8242 wrote:I was just expressing my opinion on UT2004 being shit, if you like it good for you, imo 2003 is better, anyway might try this mod if i can be arsed installing UT2004 again, takes about 17 hours .

Oh, you can be arsed alright. You can be arsed all the way to Guatemala!

Tsumura · Post by **Tsumura** » Thu Dec 22, 2005 3:21 pm

just install the damned ut and install the mod and stop crying out loud cos of space if u dun like it it's so simple as deleting ffs

Post by **special_Kare** » Thu Dec 22, 2005 3:56 pm

LD8242 wrote: .......takes about 17 hours .

thats funny, it took me 8 minutes 27 seconds exactly, just enuff time for me to make some grilled cheese!

LD8242 · Post by **LD8242** » Thu Dec 22, 2005 9:53 pm

special_Kare wrote:
LD8242 wrote: .......takes about 17 hours .
thats funny, it took me 8 minutes 27 seconds exactly, just enuff time for me to make some grilled cheese!

Ah but you don't have a celery

Rickshaw · Post by **Rickshaw** » Fri Dec 23, 2005 7:22 pm

LD8242 wrote:
special_Kare wrote:
LD8242 wrote: .......takes about 17 hours .
thats funny, it took me 8 minutes 27 seconds exactly, just enuff time for me to make some grilled cheese!
Ah but you don't have a celery

Why must you turn this delicious meal into a smorgasbord of trash. Shame on whoever puts celery on grilled cheese.

Is a celeron faster than a pentium III?

Post by **special_Kare** » Fri Dec 23, 2005 11:45 pm

Rickshaw wrote:Is a celeron faster than a pentium III?

no...u have much more L2 cache within the pentium 3 also the pentium 3 has a faster bus speed than the celeron

LD8242 · Post by **LD8242** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 12:12 am

special_Kare wrote:no...u have much more L2 cache within the pentium 3 also the pentium 3 has a faster bus speed than the celeron

Megor · Post by **Megor** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 1:51 am

special_Kare wrote:
Rickshaw wrote:Is a celeron faster than a pentium III?
no...u have much more L2 cache within the pentium 3 also the pentium 3 has a faster bus speed than the celeron

Uh, that would really depend WHICH celeron series. Celerons are just PN cpus with cache reduced, a 2ghz celeron is goingto kick the crap out of a 500mhz p3

Post by **special_Kare** » Sat Dec 24, 2005 3:40 am

Megor wrote:
special_Kare wrote:
Rickshaw wrote:Is a celeron faster than a pentium III?
no...u have much more L2 cache within the pentium 3 also the pentium 3 has a faster bus speed than the celeron
Uh, that would really depend WHICH celeron series. Celerons are just PN cpus with cache reduced, a 2ghz celeron is goingto kick the crap out of a 500mhz p3

cmon now...you're getting all technical for no reason, the comparison is a plain ol' celeron versus a plain ol' p3

by plain ol' i mean under 1ghz

Get UTR!!

Get UTR!!

Re: Get UTR!!