Page 1 of 1
www.Hazha.com
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 6:23 pm
by Captain_Obvious
It has recently come to my attention that I am the owner of hazha.com.
What should I put there???!!
http://www.hazha.com
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 7:39 pm
by LD8242
The music!!! omfg rofl
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 1:34 am
by Rickshaw
I have no ideas
..........as of yet
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 3:45 am
by Lorus
A spiked mullet. Very nice!
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 8:28 am
by pinkbandit
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 10:16 pm
by Captain_Obvious
I have an idea.... which I may or may not be putting online in the next couple days.
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 1:41 pm
by Captain_Obvious
update: I have a new idea which will be orgasmic
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 2:19 pm
by pinkbandit
Captain_Obvious wrote:update: I have a new idea which will be orgasmic
All ears...
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 8:40 pm
by Denial
Will your host let you put pornography on their web space?
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 10:12 pm
by dede
Denial wrote:Will your host let you put pornography on their web space?
Leave it 2 a man 2 suggest porn
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 10:14 pm
by smantie
dede wrote:Denial wrote:Will your host let you put pornography on their web space?
Leave it 2 a man 2 suggest porn
So you claim you can't talk on TS and post at the same time?
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 10:14 pm
by Bitchy
dede wrote:Denial wrote:Will your host let you put pornography on their web space?
Leave it 2 a man 2 suggest porn
Leave it to a man to think that a web-site could be "orgasmic".
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 10:15 pm
by smantie
Bitchy wrote:dede wrote:Denial wrote:Will your host let you put pornography on their web space?
Leave it 2 a man 2 suggest porn
Leave it to a man to think that a web-site could be "orgasmic".
http://WWW.FREEWEBS.COM/FOLCHISHRINE !!! Just try and tell me
that's not orgasmic to the max.
Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 11:45 am
by Captain_Obvious
Oh sorry, by "orgasmic" I ment "lame and a waste of the internet".
My mistake.
Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 11:48 am
by Captain_Obvious
lol smantie, that website looks strikingly similar to
http://www.unitedsocialistfront.com
Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 1:42 pm
by smantie
I wonder why?
Cheap = cheap. Except one was payed for, the other wasn't. The problem is that when you have a site multiple people update you need it to be as simple to do as possible. Thus the crappy site
